Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Amanda Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

Style Matters

Higher Ed Inspires Labor “Videos of the Year”

Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll

Sister Carrie and Television

A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Bad Books

Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

The Valley of Elah as our Heart of Darkness

“what-have-you intriguing subject”

Louis Menand, The Marketplace of Ideas

Time’s Arrow in Literary Space

Martin Amis’s Pregnant Widow

Baddest of the Bad

The “Crisis” in Literary Studies, by Mimi & Eunice

The Hurt Locker’s Addiction to Detachment, and Ours

Luther Blissett on Style Matters

Jim Harrison on Style Matters

Jonathan M on Style Matters

Ray Davis on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Luther Blissett on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Bill Benzon on Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll

ajay on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Rohan Amanda Maitzen on Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll

Bill Benzon on Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll

Bill Benzon on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Ray Davis on Bad Books

Ray Davis on Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll

Luther Blissett on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Ray Davis on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Joe Linker on Louis Menand, The Marketplace of Ideas

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Thinkers We

Posted by Bill Benzon on 11/20/08 at 07:35 PM

Teh Typealyzer is one of those interweb thingies that classifies things when you feed it some this or that. In this case, you feed it a URL and it tells you what kind of blog lives there. I fed it The Valve’s URL and it deduced that we are Thinkers: “The logical and analytical type. They are especialy attuned to difficult creative and intellectual challenges and always look for something more complex to dig into. They are great at finding subtle connections between things and imagine far-reaching implications.” I especially like that “far-reaching implications” part. Further, we “enjoy working with complex things using a lot of concepts and imaginative models of reality.” OK.

Teh Typealizer also coughs up a diagram of the brain that’s shaded to indicate which parts we use when thinking Valvish thoughts. Color it worthless.

As for how it does what it does, David Beaver at Language Log guesses:

The Typalyzer [sic] seems to use a standard machine classification technique. Presumably the creators have created a little database consisting of example websites with classifications that they think are appropriate, then trained the classifier with these examples. Now the classifier gives instant classifications of sites it’s never seen before based, broadly, on how similar the new sites are to the old ones. It’s likely that the classifier is primarily using what’s called a “bag of words” technique. That is, similarity of one site to another is based on the relative frequencies of words used on the sites. Then based on the classification, the machine chooses which misleading picture to take from a vast database of misleading pictures. All well and good. If you’ve any faith at all in the psychological categories they use, then this is neat way to do cheap psychology.]

Seems reasonable to me.


Comments

I don’t think the brain picture is at all to be taken literally - in fact, I didn’t even notice it behind the axes of the graph until David Beaver’s post pointed it out. I highly doubt anybody’s under the illusion that there’s some physical mapping that corresponds to the T/F or S/N polarities.

I actually think the tool could be quite valuable, though I wish the creators would divulge some specifics about their methodology so we know how much human intervention there is in tuning the classifications, and at what stage it occurs.

Like some of what goes on in literary theory (such as the continued influence of Freud), the “correctness” of the Myers-Briggs as a psychological model that corresponds to reality doesn’t matter: what matters is that many people use it as an intuitive form of representation anyway, and a machine’s capacity to emulate that representation can tell us a lot about the way people read voices - like the kind of formal features they pick up on to infer the persona behind a text.

By Nicholas Tam on 11/20/08 at 08:56 PM | Permanent link to this comment

It may not be scientifically rigorous, but it’s good fun. As the previous poster says, the classifications seem to be from the [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator"]Myers-Briggs Type Indicator<A>. A straw poll of blogs gave about the resuts I’d expect:

INTP: The libertarian lawyers over at <a href="http://www.volokh.com">The Volokh Conspiracy[/url]

ESTP: Village Voice sex and gaming columnist Bonnie Ruberg

ISTP: Those Godless Dawinists at Pharynguala

I’d be interested to know how they trained the classifier. The obvious way to do it would be to use a set of blogs whose author’s Meyer’s Briggs type was already known (e.g. you ask a sample of bloggers to take a standard Meyers-Briggs test).

It might be even more interesting if they’d trained it against MMPI-2 scales… (Do Bonnie’s contributers score high on measures of depression like scale 2/D or DEP? Do Volokh’s score high on scale 4/PD? Hours of fun.)

By on 11/21/08 at 09:20 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: