Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register
Valve Links
The Front Page
Statement of Purpose
Current Authors
John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Amanda Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors
Past Authors
Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones
Most recent articles
Steam Cleaning: The Valve Blogroll
Sister Carrie and Television
A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
Bad Books
Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis
The Valley of Elah as our Heart of Darkness
“what-have-you intriguing subject”
Louis Menand, The Marketplace of Ideas
Time’s Arrow in Literary Space
Martin Amis’s Pregnant Widow
Baddest of the Bad
The “Crisis” in Literary Studies, by Mimi & Eunice
The Hurt Locker’s Addiction to Detachment, and Ours
Academic Publishing Again (or, Still)
Learning to Remember
Most recent comments
Rich Puchalsky on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
Rohan Amanda Maitzen on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
Jessica Lewis-Turner on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
ajay on The Hurt Locker’s Addiction to Detachment, and Ours
Luther Blissett on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
Tony Christini on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis
Bill Benzon on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis
StevenAugustine on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?
Athena Andreadis on Bad Books
Rohan Amanda Maitzen on "what-have-you intriguing subject"
Tony Christini on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis
Bill Benzon on "what-have-you intriguing subject"
Rohan Amanda Maitzen on "what-have-you intriguing subject"
Ray Davis on Graphs, Maps, Trees and Breeding
Sisyphus on Sister Carrie and Television
Archives
Syndication
Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom
Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom
Validation
XHTML | CSS
Credits
Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.
Blogroll
2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders
<< Literature Today | Front Page | Macbeth and any half-decent contracts lawyer >>
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Theory & Comics, Together At Last (Again); or, What If…?
Posted by Scott Eric Kaufman on 07/04/06 at 12:03 AM
[X-posted to Acephalous. The reason for the “again” above, if you’re curious.]
Passage from a letter excerpted in Ernest Jone’s The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (3:392):
If I had my life to live over again, I should devote myself to telepathy rather than to psychoanalysis.
To which I can only say this:
What would the world look like if Freud had his druthers? What would theory debates look like? What claims made? I planned on outlining this all, but got so involved in the gimmick I’m too tired to make the joke.
But ... we would be able to empirically verify telepathy. Subject A draws a card from the deck and looks at it. Subject B (in another room) tells the experimenter which card A can see. And gets it right, repeatedly and repeatably. All good experimental science.
The existence of telepathy would also make it much easier to reason about authorial intent. We could know what an author really meant by reading their mind directly. This could be experimentally repeatable because anyone who wants to can read the author’s mind themselves, and check that the author really is thinking what the critic claims they are thinking.
Roger Luckhurst’s The Invention of Telepathy (Oxford, 2002) is a very good book to read if you’re interested in the cultural history of telepathy.
Dude, why settle for cultural history? I want to read people’s minds.
What if the author changes his mind?
ISSUE #1
INT. DR FREUD’S LABORATORY.
A man is strapped to a chair, with electrodes taped to his skull. The electrodes are connected to a Rube Goldberg contraption of giant capacitors, Tesla coils, etc. A projector screen on the wall shows a martian from “Quatermass and the Pit”.
DR FREUD: At last! I have perfected the device!
(cut to projected image of martian)
DR FREUD (VOICE OVER): I can see into men’s minds!
(cut to close-up of Dr Freud)
DR FREUD: There will be no more misunderstandings! No more war!
DR FREUD: A new era of human happiness!
INT. BOARD ROOM.
Five middle-aged men in dark suits sit around a table.
COMMITTEE MEMBER #1: Does Dr Freud have any idea what we will do with his invention?
COMMITTEE MEMBER #2: Not a clue.
COMMITTEE MEMBER #3: He’s a useful idiot.
Susan, that’s what I’d have like to have written, had I still the energy to do so then.
Jonathan, Alison Winter’s Mesmerized: Powers of Mind in Victorian Britain is also interesting.
mythusmage, I suppose we’d have to create a hierarchy of intention, in which the most valuable intent statements would be those made in the weeks and months immediately after the passages in question were written.
Another interesting question would be: what would we do if the author answered “I don’t know” and we read his mind and, in fact, he didn’t. Character X has a scar on his left arm just because. Could that still be meaningful?
I’d be interested to hear a bit more about Freud’s useful idiocy, from either Scott or Susan. How so, in your opinion?
Patience, CR, patience. I’m getting there. (You’ll remember, of course, that that was precisely the topic of inaugural post here. I still think it may be had, but it’ll have to be earned, not granted.)
Add a comment: