Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Thursday, March 27, 2008

The Worst Titles of Henry James

Posted by Adam Roberts on 03/27/08 at 06:58 AM

James? Fine writer.  His titles? Classics, all: Portrait of a LadyWhat Maisie Knew. The Princess Casamassamissima.  Models of the titler’s art, every last one.

All?  By way of providing balance, here is a list of The Valve’s nominations for the five worst Jamesian titles, in reverse order:

5. ‘The Jolly Corner’ (1908).  The upbeat, corner-equivalent of The Naughty Step.
4.  English Hours (1905).  Trades on a hoary old misunderstanding: the days when English hours had two hundred and forty minutes are long gone.  Nowadays English hours are no different to any other nation’s hours.
3. A Little Tour in France.  You Know.  For Kids. (1884)
2. The Reverberator.  Starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. (1888)

And the undisputed winner:

1. Crapy Cornelia (1910).  She is called Cornelia; she wears a crappy hat.  Indeed, she is a crappy individual.  Don’t you want to read her story?  No?


Comments

"The Great Good Place” and “The Real Right Thing” make one of those couples who are worse together than apart.

By Ray Davis on 03/27/08 at 08:56 AM | Permanent link to this comment

"She didn’t look at him; she only, from under her frumpy, crapy, curiously exotic hat, and with her good little near-sighted insinuating glare, expressed to Mrs Worthingham, while she answered him, wonderful arch things, the overdone things of a shy woman.”

And people pick on PKD for his sentences?

Really, even aside from structure, this sentence is a monster.  What the heck is a “good little near-sighted insinuating glare”?

This is a good introduction to a great passive-aggressive word, though: crapy: adj, “resembling crepe” (1913 Webster).  I can hardly wait to use it.

By on 03/27/08 at 09:07 AM | Permanent link to this comment

"The Princess Casamassamissima”?  I mussust have mississed that one.

By Dave Maier on 03/27/08 at 11:31 AM | Permanent link to this comment

“The Princess Casamassamissima”?

Well-spotted: I meant, of course, “The Princess Cassamassassamassamissima”.

By Adam Roberts on 03/27/08 at 12:01 PM | Permanent link to this comment

"Airtight Granny”?

no wait… that was a porn film.

By Jonathan M on 03/27/08 at 12:42 PM | Permanent link to this comment

You must have been thinking of “Guy Domville”.

By nnyhav on 03/27/08 at 02:21 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Rich, a “good little near-sighted insinuating glare” is the verbal version of exactly what it describes.  It performs its referent.  It is itself a good little near-sighted insinuating glare.  The glare is created by the phrase’s opening salvo of clipped syllables and the way it opens up rhythmically and aurally, with “near-sighted insinuating.” The fun of “good little” rubbed up against “insinuating glare” is great too.

By on 03/27/08 at 05:56 PM | Permanent link to this comment

It’s a mess, Luther.  Piling up contradictory adjectives into a multiple-car collision doesn’t perform an insinuating glare.  I suspect that one or more of those words had different connotations back in 1910, but even so, trying to match that string of words to a mental image of what she’s actually supposed to be doing is a mess.  And the free indirect, if that’s what it is, that’s mixed in is just tiresome.

By on 03/27/08 at 08:04 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Yeah, Rich, it doesn’t perform an insinuating glare.  It performs a good little near-sighted insinuating glare, which James is explicitly telling us is different than an insinuating glare.  She’s shy, she’s overdoing things, she’s trying to be socially savvy, and she’s trying to insinuate something without someone else knowing.  By itself, an insinuating glare would be pretty intense stuff.  But James is telling us it’s not a particularly graceful or subtle insinuation.  Good and little diminish the affect.  It’s the same as “shooting” someone a glare—but good and little show us how obvious the gesture is.  That James leads with them is like dampening a piano chord. 

The look is awkward; the woman is awkward; the phrase is awkward. 

But I’m not going to continue this argument beyond this post.  I’m tired of it already.

By on 03/27/08 at 08:16 PM | Permanent link to this comment

One of the problems I have with James, and to some extent, most writers before the Modern period, was their insistence in using the whole of the English language in each and every novel. One word would never suffice where twenty could be used, in order to show off that indeed, the author did own a thesaurus and it was sitting right there on his writing table. Hence the existence of such turns of phrase as, “good little near-sighted insinuating glare”. any sane editor today would see that and say, “No, Henry. Just no.”

By Keith on 03/28/08 at 02:52 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I will not argue with Rich, but I will argue with Keith.  To say: Keith, you’re completely wrong.

The problem with too much writing today is the fact that editors and creative writing professors have a bunch of pseudo-Hemingwayan rules of prose writing (and lyric poetry writing, itself a subset of prose writing these days): no adjectives or adverbs; cut cut cut; only concrete words; short sentences; everyday subjects.  It’s a retarded empiricism.

Compare that to Sherwood Anderson or Faulkner or Fitzgerald, writers for whom thick description, complex abstraction, and rich syntax are the key ingredients.  There’s more to writing than “The Killers.” (And it doesn’t really take a thesaurus to write “good little near-sighted insinuating glare.")

Can you imagine some New York punk editing Shakspeare?  “Billy, my mensch, you simply must get rid of all these words you’re stealing from Latin.  And why do these characters talk to themselves?  And why don’t your sentences start with their subjects?  Why is there all this gunk between the nouns and verbs?  Remember that in today’s literature, everybody must talk like an emotionally stunted chipmunk.  Will, look at this new story we’re about to publish.  Here’s drama:

“‘Ted.’
‘Yeah.’
‘Our marriage.’
‘Yeah.’
‘You’re a bastard.’
‘Look at the sky.’
‘Huh.’”

BTW: You cannot remove a single word from James’s phrase without changing its meaning.  The pleasure of reading James is the pleasure of reading a word-hungry man painstakingly constructing a world—constructing so well that it often seems like he’s actually observing a world.

By on 03/28/08 at 05:10 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: