Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Sunday, December 04, 2005

The NYU Strike

Posted by Jonathan Goodwin on 12/04/05 at 01:20 AM

Word on the street is that Alan Sokal and Andrew Ross both support the striking graduate students, whereas it seems that Paul Boghossian, who has a piece in the Theory’s Empire volume you may remember from a while back, supports the administration. David Velleman, also of NYU’s “ranked the undisputed number one [philosophy] department in the world" suggests in a comment to Jason Stanley’s guest-post over at Brian Leiter’s blog that he supported the graduate student unions at public university Michigan, but does not at private NYU.

I was involved in my graduate student union at public Florida, including soliciting signatures for a recertification drive, and support the striking students at private NYU. Whatever your opinion about this may be, I think that the public/private divide raised by Velleman and Boghossian is worth discussing, particularly as it pertains to graduate education. I don’t know if any other department at NYU has the same success at placing its graduate students as the philosophy department seems to. That might be relevant to the very different perceptions of graduate student welfare seen in the Democracy Now! interview I linked to above.


Comments

More white-collar workers should be organizing anyway.  I did think it was funny how Paul Boghossian was holding out such an obvious version of the American Dream myth to repress his labor.  All the bit about how the students (who he distinguished from the adjuncts for this reason) still had the opportunity to become tenured one day, and therefore he didn’t want to lock them in to a labor-management relationship.  As if anyone ever unionized is branded with a big letter “U” (for “Underclass”, perhaps?).

The purported $50,000 package is also rather funny, since there are so many different things wrong with it.  Do these people have any idea how much unionized employees with undergraduate degrees generally earn, in terms of total packages?  About $30,000 of it is supposedly in the form of tuition: really?  I thought that grad students generally only take classes in their first two years, and teach for years after that.  I also wonder whether other industries are going to start picking this up as part of their conpensation.  You know, “We taught you on the job how to weld; that gives you a useful skill.  Therefore we’ve determined that 3/5 of your package is payment in the form of us teaching you.  By the way, now that you’ve mastered welding, goodbye, we’re firing you and hiring an unskilled worker.”

By on 12/04/05 at 10:24 AM | Permanent link to this comment

If you were going to distinguish between public and private universities, it seems to me that you would argue the other way: that since private universities exist in competition with each other, while public universities have taxpayer-guaranteed existence, that striking against a private university is more unobjectionable than striking against a public.

By on 12/04/05 at 12:23 PM | Permanent link to this comment

P.B. offers some background to his bizarre position in the comments section over at Leiter’s site:

One of the areas in which our department is weak is in Aesthetics. We certainly have no graduate students who work in that area. So when one of our new hires offered to give a course in that area, we had no qualified graduate student to assign to that course, so we went out, at some expense, to hire a highly qualified young PhD from outside the University to serve as a teaching assistant for that course. The UAW filed a grienvance on the grounds that we were required by the contract to offer it to one of our graduate students. They weren’t interested in the fact that we had no student who was actually qualified to assist in the course. The arbitrator threw out the grievance, but not before a number of faculty had wasted hours preparing documents and so forth.

That’s right:  the “undisputed number one philosophy department in the world” not only is “weak” in aesthetics (no faculty with areas of specialization in that area), but in fact doesn’t even have any candidate TAs in the department who are qualified to assist in an aesthetics course. That’s how important those in power view aesthetics in my field--it can be systematically ignored by the undisputed number one department in the world, without posing any threat to that department’s rank.

In any case, another NYU philosopher comes along and links to the arbitrator’s decision in the case, which happens to be on the same page from which--admirably--one can see the UAW’s “pre-hearing brief.” As the brief makes clear, the greivance was not as P.B. describes it.  Rather, the concern was that whoever is hired was being hired to do “bargaining unit work,” so that they shouldn’t be hired under circumstances that would threaten the interests of the bargaining unit, as hiring ANYONE (NYU or non-NYO) would.

If emergencies or lack of a suitably qualified NYU TA require hiring a non-NYU person or a too-senior NYU person, fine.  (That had, after all, happened before under conditions the UAW was willing to concede made good sense.)

By on 12/05/05 at 02:05 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Sign the petition.  You can find it here under: Judith Butler to President John Sexton, NYU.

http://www.petitiononline.com

By on 12/05/05 at 11:14 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I was under the impression that Paul Boghossian represents the administration (in addition to supporting their position, of course).  I got this impression from last Friday’s Democracy Now show, on which he appeared with a representative from the graduate student union.  To my ear, Boghossian didn’t really have anything to say in response to the numerous criticisms lodged against his position, other than to reiterate that it would somehow degrade the professor-/department-graduate student relationship if graduate student’s teaching were considered “mere labor,” i.e., unionized, as opposed to part of their broader academic formation.  That struck me as a ridiculously offensive thing to say.  But then again, the guy sounded like a giant ass hole, so it was a little hard for me to listen to his arguments.

http://play.rbn.com/?url=demnow/demnow/demand/2005/dec/audio/dn20051202.ra&proto=rtsp

By on 12/05/05 at 03:35 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: