Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Sunday, May 21, 2006

The Mark Steyn Code

Posted by John Holbo on 05/21/06 at 03:47 AM

You’ve probably heard that Mark Steyn seems to have a plagiarism problem. If you haven’t, the Steyn piece is here.  Geoffrey Pullum’s original languagelog posts are here and here. The case against Steyn is laid out here and here. Just the sort of thing that deserves to get linked around for all to see and consider on the merits.

At the risk of preaching a sermon to Buddha, allow me to draw attention to a linguistic peculiarity of the Steyn column not noted by the languagelog crew. Steyn writes:

The linguist Geoffrey Pullum - or linguist Geoffrey Pullum, as novelist Dan Brown would say - identifies this as the anarthrous occupational nominal premodifier, to which renowned novelist Dan Brown is unusually partial. In Deception Point, in what must count as a wild experiment in form for him, he holds off on the AONP until the second sentence:

“Death, in this forsaken place, could come in countless forms. Geologist Charles Brophy had endured the savage splendor of this terrain for years . . ."

Now: anarthrous occupational nominal premodifier. There’s a gem you couldn’t hope to fence on any literary market in the post-google age. There was no question Steyn had to credit Pullum for that much. Steyn’s defense is that this is sufficient. The case against him is that it is insufficient. Yet it is so distintinctively insufficient (or distinctively sufficient, if you buy Steyn’s assistant’s line): Steyn makes Pullum look like the straight man in his own joke. He comes off sounding like the pedantic parent of top-heavy terminology. Predictably, you get a Steyn defender leaving a comment that starts off like so:

Pullum wrote a boring academic article ...

Steyn comes off seeming as though he should get extra style points for brilliantly bagging Brown by neatly refunctionalizing this dull academic stiff as a merry slapstick.

You might analyze the trick thusly: Steyn produces a weak, false implicature, since “... to which renowned novelist Dan Brown is unusually partial” goes slightly out of its way to be consistent with Pullum having made no Dan Brown connection, let alone joke, when it would be as easy to mention that the category has lived its entire life in the very Dan Brown joke Steyn is telling. So we have violations of the Gricean maxims of quantity, relevance and manner (and a scrupulous skirting of strict quality violations).

This technique for stripping off the humor so you can paint it on again, and sign your own name, needs some pointlessly polysyllabic ‘phrasal implicature’ name. Or we could call it ‘premature dejoculation’. It’s sort of a straight man argument, as opposed to a strawman argument, if you see what I mean. So you can write sentences like: “Detection, in this well-trafficked place, could come in countless forms. Premature dejoculator Mark Steyn had endured the rebarbative remunerativeness of this terrain for years . . .”

Something like this problem actually arises in academic writing. In order to have something original to say, you pretend so-and-so didn’t see something about his own position which, plausibly, he really did. (Not a strawman argument, because you aren’t exactly attacking. A straight man argument. You need them to say something a bit obtuse, to make a space for your cleverness.) Of course, this wouldn’t be plagiarism. Nor do I mean to get Steyn off the hook by saying so.

By the by, I just remembered that I’ve emailed Geoffrey Pullum exactly once - to inform him in all mock-seriousness that I scooped this post of his with this post of mine, which acknowledged that Brian Weatherson made the point first. Pullum very scrupulously inquired whether I felt he should update his post to give credit where due. I said it didn’t matter that much. Point being: no need to be a jerk about these things, getting all ‘I’ll see you in court’.

[via CT, via B. Ph.D.]


Comments

I was going to post about this, but only in a Muntzian way. Kudos.

Re academic writing: doesn’t that mode occur more often in philosophy than say literary criticism or history? Maybe not, but that’s where it seems familiar to me.

By Jonathan Goodwin on 05/21/06 at 09:58 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Thanks, Jonathan. I think the technique is fairly ubiquitous, not just in philosophy. Whether or not you accept everything Harold Bloom says about misreading, for example, there is something to what the man says.

By John Holbo on 05/21/06 at 10:14 AM | Permanent link to this comment

How do you figure?

By Jonathan Goodwin on 05/21/06 at 10:15 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Now you’re just misreading me for fun and profit.

By John Holbo on 05/21/06 at 10:17 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I was just teaching the Phaedrus, and it’s true about how those sources can’t talk back, can’t defend themselves from hasty and deliberately myopic summary. Perhaps the internet can change this somehow.

By Jonathan Goodwin on 05/21/06 at 10:21 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Speaking of which, who wants to have a mini-symposium on “Plato’s Pharmacy?”

By Jonathan Goodwin on 05/21/06 at 10:22 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Say ‘know’ to drugs. That’s the only Platonic solution. I would actually be up for discussing “Plato’s Pharmacy”, because I recently reread it quite carefully and am actually more positive about it than I used to be.

By John Holbo on 05/21/06 at 10:28 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I thought that was called Timese.

By on 05/21/06 at 11:17 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I submit that we actually have no choice but to call it “premature dejoculation”.  The phenomenon would thus join premature vernaculation as but one of many mishaps to which overhasty speech is prey.

By ben wolfson on 05/22/06 at 12:51 AM | Permanent link to this comment

If comedy is theft, is dispossession nine-tenths of the laugh?

By nnyhav on 05/22/06 at 12:07 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: