Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

The Country and the City, by Raymond Williams

Posted by Andrew Seal on 06/23/10 at 06:41 AM

It is both a shame and also perfectly understandable that Raymond Williams’s The Country and the City is one of those title-line citation books: those monographs which are obligatorily footnoted whenever certain keywords turn up—in this case, the combination or interaction of “city and country.” But that citation is usually no more than a quod vide, a sort of ritual genuflection or ass-covering acknowledgment ("yes, reader, I know the locus classicus too").

This desultory reference is a shame because the book does repay more in-depth discussion or elaboration and because, at least in my experience, few historians and fewer literature scholars engage with this dynamic very deeply with or without Williams’s guidance.

Yet it is also, as I say, perfectly understandable because a very great proportion of The Country and the City lends itself only very weakly to adaptation or appropriation; only the final few chapters really seem meant to inspire further work or to indicate the possibility of connection to other questions, projects, or histories. The rather foxy title belies the monograph’s more hedgehoggy content. Williams’s study of English literature depicting the English countryside (and, rather cursorily, the English city, meaning almost exclusively London) is resolutely single-minded; after a bit of throat-clearing about classical pastoral traditions, I count only 14 references to non-Anglo-Irish writers in the remainder of the book.1 Over about 290 pages (excluding the chapter on classical pastorals), that’s around one every 21 pages. That is certainly not very expansive or wide-ranging; there is little else besides the very particular literary history of this particular set of tropes in English literature. To do more than name-check Williams’s book in any context other than the one he actually wrote about would essentially require taking the book’s argumentative skeleton and graft on everything else—muscles, tendons, skin and blood. It would take a complete re-writing. It is not, in other words, a Foucault-type genealogy or archaeology of knowledge.

Which begs the question whether there have been comparable studies of the tropes of “country-and-city” in, say, the U.S. or in Canada, in India or France, Russia or Mexico, Nigeria or Brasil. I may simply have missed these wonderful books, but I think the answer is actually ‘no’—at least for U.S. literature, there have been attempts to write literary histories of depictions of the city and there have been attempts to write literary histories of depictions of the country, but there is no single study which actively attempts to fuse those together and read them as not only the same history but the result of a single process or regime (capitalism), which is what Williams does. Now, that might simply amount to asking for a Marxist study of American literature with a particular attention to images and symbols of geography, but is that really so much to ask?

In a subsequent post, I’d like to outline what Williams actually does in his own study and what the tropes which he identifies are, and then I’d like to discuss how they may be adapted or supplemented to fit the U.S. case a little better, but for now I’d like merely to pose the question of why it seems to be difficult to think of the literary history of the countryside and the literary history of the city as existing together. In part, Williams’s book is an analysis of the ideologies which keep those literary histories apart, why it is even popular to see the country and the city as cleanly and self-evidently separate in history and more especially in literature. One particular reason which he gives between the lines, as it were, is most interesting to me: when Williams speaks of his own life’s journey, as he does very movingly, or of the three figures whom one benighted British Council critic called “our three great autodidacts"—George Eliot, Thomas Hardy, and D. H. Lawrence—or even with Hardy’s character Jude, Williams notes the personal impact of the basic life pattern of moving from the countryside to a city or an intellectual metropole of sorts (i.e., Oxford or Cambridge). It is difficult not to take the basic autobiographical bifurcation of country and city as existing in different parts or moments of one’s life and turn it into a more general historical or sociological paradigm.

1Actually, I also did not count references from a chapter near the end which specifically treats contemporary Third-World literature and British imperialism. This is the chapter I meant as inspiring further work.


Comments

Is it too much to ask that younger scholars comprehend the difference between a “topos” and “trope”? Williams knew the difference.

By on 06/23/10 at 06:20 PM | Permanent link to this comment

"Trope” is now a well-established synonym for “topos” and has been for at least thirty-five years, as far as I can tell.

By Andrew Seal on 06/23/10 at 06:43 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I would add that you obviously don’t know what a “question-begging expression” is.  Jesus, who’s educating you?  A topos is a stock argument in classical/Renaissance rhetoric.  A “trope” is a “turning” (do you know any Greek?) of the meaning of a word from its ordinary use.  It’s important.  If you care about history.  So glad I’m at a land-grant university where we care about this shit.

By on 06/23/10 at 07:47 PM | Permanent link to this comment

There’s a historical narrative that you are effacing, perhaps:  we don’t get Williams without Empson’s “Some Versions of Pastoral.” Williams is not writing in a vacuum, but in a tradition.

Leo Marx’s “Machine in the Garden” is the book that comes closest, I think, to the kind of AmLit history you want to do); 1964.  You might want to look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_in_the_Garden --I do not know whether Williams knew Leo Marx’s work, but certainly, they have been brought into conversation by subsequent thinkers.

Marx would argue, I think, that the landscape is loaded differently in the US, and so he focuses on the tensions between machines and gardens, civilization and landscape. 

Anyway:  identifying the faults of a landmark work is a good way to create a space for your own work, Andrew.  Maybe your reading of its problematic will be novel.  But be careful about the linguistic tools you use to articulate those faults (JAA is right about topos and trope, and I doubt you could find a dictionary that gives you support; you meant to say “raises the question,” not “begs the question.") Let’s get to your argument to make these slipperinesses fade quickly.

By on 06/23/10 at 08:48 PM | Permanent link to this comment

You’re right about the “begging the question,” and, as rude as you’re being about it, I thank you for correcting me. It won’t happen again.

On the other hand, while I actually do know the etymology of “trope” and its original meaning, I also know that it has since acquired the meaning of “recurrent figure or motif,” and that most scholars not only use it in the manner I did, but accept that meaning as a completely valid usage.

By Andrew Seal on 06/23/10 at 08:48 PM | Permanent link to this comment

syntaxfactory,

Thanks, those are good references and I actually intended to bring both books up in the next post--particularly Marx (and the tradition of myth and symbol criticism), as I wanted to talk about why Marx’s book ultimately doesn’t work to fill this gap in American literary history. But as far as the American work that comes *closest* to reading the literary histories of the country and the city together, I guess it’s the reigning contender.

And not to belabor the point, but the OED actually does have the definition of ‘trope’ that I am using.

By Andrew Seal on 06/23/10 at 09:01 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Andrew, I look forward to your take on Marx.  His work remains one of my favorite pieces of literary/cultural criticism.  Try as I might to see myth and symbol criticism as naive or wrongheaded, I continue to find it among the most illuminating perspectives on literature.  Every September, I teach the first episode of *The Power of Myth* to my high school sophomores, who are about to begin a journey through Antigone, Les Miserables, The Odyssey, Much Ado about Nothing, and The Metamorphosis.  And as much as I think I’m finally going to find Campbell hoaky, I’m always surprised by how much sense his ideas make.  And contemporary scholars, like Lewis Hyde and Roberto Calasso, who follow in that tradition, are equally powerful.

By on 06/24/10 at 05:58 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Luther,
I certainly count myself a fan of myth and symbol criticism--I probably feel about Henry Nash Smith’s Virgin Land the way you do about Marx. (And I plan on bringing up HNS’s chapter on The Myth of the Garden up as well in the next post.) But ultimately, myth and symbol analysis isn’t very interested in the kind of synthesis I’m after here. Not, of course, that it intended to be, or needed to be.

By Andrew Seal on 06/24/10 at 06:30 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Andrew, there is something called “Country and the City Revisited,” an edited collection with essays focused specifically on the period Williams was looking at. It’s expensive, but if a copy could be acquired from a library it might enrich the discussion of your subsequent posts

It might also be worth pointing out that Williams does do a few pages in The Country and the City on postcolonial literature, including Caribbean, African and some Indian writing. I haven’t re-read it, but Books.google.com is showing a discussion between pp. 284-288.

I’m going to do a little digging at U-Penn to see if I can find studies of Indian literature in particular that cite Williams… and get back to you.

By Amardeep Singh on 06/25/10 at 11:08 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Amardeep,
Williams’s chapter on postcolonial applications of the city-country dynamic was probably my favorite of the book--the style loosens up a lot, and he’s suddenly doing the broad-scope theorizing I had been hoping for from the beginning. Those few pages are probably worth at least a post in themselves, although I’m probably not the best qualified person to do it.

I’ll check out the Country and the City Revisited book you mention--thanks!

By Andrew Seal on 06/25/10 at 12:42 PM | Permanent link to this comment

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2290

By Jonathan Goodwin on 07/02/10 at 03:57 PM | Permanent link to this comment

"Now, that might simply amount to asking for a Marxist study of American literature with a particular attention to images and symbols of geography, but is that really so much to ask?”

This is what my dissertation proposes to do, although its less about “images and symbols” and more about literary form and genre. So thanks for analysis, very interesting and helpful.

By on 07/22/10 at 12:37 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: