Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Thursday, April 13, 2006

The Advantages and Disadvantages of Enlightenment’s Discontents and Dan Brown For Life

Posted by John Holbo on 04/13/06 at 09:03 PM

Amusing meditation on Habermasian phlegmatics at theoria:

My goal for this afternoon was to read a significant chunk of On the Logic of the Social Sciences; I have, as of yet, made it a full seven pages into the book. Tortuous prose. Infinite digressions into the needlessly obscure. And then, what does he say? Essentially, “Well, really, we didn’t need to do all this. People aren’t neo-Kantians anymore. And, besides, most can’t even spell Rickert’s name.”

Section 1.2, however, begins with a neo-Kantian, viz, Ernst Cassirer. I’m sure it will end in the same way. “No need to have done this. People haven’t ever been and won’t ever be Cassirerian. They likely couldn’t find his books in the library.”

Richard Rorty has a similar problem, minus the ponderosity. An impulse to public sphere-worthy public intellectual, generalist plenitude treads on the toes of a refined attachment to a salon-sized set of philosophical figures and problems. The moment comes when Rorty declares: ‘but we polypragmatic, post-Wittgensteinian, post-Heideggerian, ironist, liberal, progressive, Dewey-reading, Davidson-quoting, secular ... ‘; a thought which completes itself thusly: ‘me and whose liberal ironist army?’ Habermas, to his credit, often completes the thought. But I prefer Rorty for the fresher prose stylings.

Speaking of the fate of Enlightenment, Chris Brooke has initiated an interesting discussion at the Virtual Stoa. He solicits answers to eight questions. I am particularly interested in #5: “Do you think the idea of the “Counter-Enlightenment” is a useful category or not, either intellectually or historiographically?” Since I make use of the notion, it would be inconvenient for some of my work if it turned out not to be usable.

If that’s too heavy for you, Brooke also has excerpted amusing bits from the Dan Brown judgement

Dan Brown doesn’t come terribly well out of the judgment at all (see §§197-217, 315-327, 343-5 especially), but fortunately for him he was up against Claimants like Michael Baigent, whose performance as a witness is described here:

“Mr Baigent was a poor witness. Those are not my words: they are the words of his own Counsel in his written closing submissions (paragraph 111). Those words do not in my view do justice to the inadequacy of Mr Baigent’s performance...” (§213)

And the judge observed a bit later

“I make allowances for the fact that Mr Baigent performed so badly he plainly missed obvious points when answering questions… Nevertheless the Defendants are right in their submissions even when taking in to account the factors mentioned above to submit that he was a thoroughly unreliable witness. They say that they do not know whether he was deliberately trying to mislead the court or was simply deluded and that he is either extremely dishonest or a complete fool. I do not need to decide that issue...” (§232)

There’s this, too, which I liked, when the judge was commenting on the evidence of Mr Ruben, a senior person at Random House, Dan Brown’s publisher: “His enthusiasm of the book [The Da Vinci Code] knew no bounds. I am not sure that it is as good as he says but then I am no literary person.” (§354)

If you missed it, Kieran Setiya has collected some exquisitely mean reviews. It might be funny to have a ‘most passive-aggressive legal decisions’ competition. Some judges really shine when it comes to radiating contempt within the confines of their duties.


Comments

I guess I somehow mentally skipped “If that’s too heavy for you...,” so I spent a couple minutes puzzling on the possible relationship between the two parts of the post.

I loved the judge in that one Intelligent Design case, too.

By Adam Kotsko on 04/14/06 at 10:19 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Sorry - are you calling me a liberal ironist!?

By Craig on 04/14/06 at 01:50 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Nope. Are you one?

By John Holbo on 04/14/06 at 01:58 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Not the best of my knowledge!  It’s been a long thirty-six hours.  Just yesterday I was accused of being a “byatch post-modern Kantian”.  Being called a “liberal ironist” wasn’t far from the realm of possibility, all things considered.

By Craig on 04/14/06 at 02:11 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: