Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

No!

Posted by Daniel Green on 06/14/06 at 06:00 AM

From D.T. Max’s New Yorker article on Stephen Joyce, prickly and uncooperative grandson of James:

More than a dozen Joyce scholars told me that what was once an area of exploration and discovery now resembles an embattled outpost of copyright law. Robert Spoo, who used to edit the James Joyce Quarterly, which is published by the University of Tulsa, quit the job to become a copyright lawyer. “New biographies, digital representations of Joyce’s work, analyses of Joyce’s manuscripts, and, to a lesser extent, criticism—they hardly exist,” he said. “People either despaired of doing them . . . or the demands were so high that they just didn’t feel it was worth continuing the discussions.” Although more than fifteen hundred letters and dozens of manuscript drafts have been discovered since Stephen gained control of the estate, scholars told me that no new biographies of Joyce or his family are under way. The estate has not licensed online versions of “Ulysses” and “Finnegans Wake,” seminal works for hypertext theory. Anyone who plans to study Joyce today has to wonder whether it will be worth the strain. In 2003, Thomas Staley, the director of special collections at the University of Texas, in Austin, folded the Joyce Studies Annual after twelve years, in part to avoid dealing with Stephen. “He is an almost impossible person,” Staley told me. (Buck Mulligan to Dedalus: “O, an impossible person!”)

I have to say that, despite Stephen Joyce’s manifest philistinism, I finished this article feeling some sympathy for his position. When he’s refusing to allow “scholarly” intrusion into the private lives of the Joyce family for gossipy biographies, he’s doing everyone a favor. Unfortunately, however, he seems incapable of distinguishing between this kind of useless speculation and genuine criticism seeking to explicate Joyce’s work. When he declares that all commentators on Joyce’s fiction merely “want to brand this great work with their mark,” he’s just being dense.

(Although I also have to say that Stephen’s hostility toward the Irish government, which has embraced Joyce only after it became expedient to do so, seems to me entirely well-founded.)


Comments

Grandson. Best quote: “The line dies with me.”

By nnyhav on 06/14/06 at 07:47 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I think the article rightly points out the inconsistency in SJJ’s thoughts about his grandfather’s work. On one hand, it’s this stuff any reader can and should pick up and enjoy, and on the other, all the scholars and critics of JJ have been misunderstanding him.

It reminded me a great deal of when I used to live with someone who managed his poet father’s work with an iron fist. He insisted that the poems were for the “people,” who are always assumed to be wonderful, generous readers, not for “scholars,” who kill poems by vivisection. Ironically, though, he would not release his father’s work for “popular” editions, which would be crass, capitalistic, and not true to his father’s ideals. The only people who own his work are those who know enough to hunt down the rare small press editions, which are wildly expensive collectors’ items now.

I’ve always been fascinated by this disconnect among literary types between “the people” (good readers) and “academics” (bad readers) and between “popular editions” (bad) and “small press editions” (good). And if a professor teaches a work, doesn’t that increase its circle of influence? Is this position toward the literary estate made coherent by assuming that the draw of the work must be so strong that even those who have never stepped in a classroom will spend days hunting down the right edition, merely for the pleasure?

By A White Bear on 06/14/06 at 08:44 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Some academic commentors make me feel like they’re doing the conceptual equivalent of explaining jokes.  What I put in the books should be something for the readers to discover on their own, and some readers will know more about the books than other readers.  I don’t think science fiction has gained any reader from having Ph.D. thesises done on works only two years old (which meant the thesis in question started about the instant the book was published).

Academics can be excellent readers and trade paperbacks are the way to go.

By on 06/14/06 at 11:50 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Didn’t Joyce peak about 30-40 years ago? By the time the material is released, interest will probably be less. The guy is a mix of the dog in the manger and pennywise poundfoolish. (Note annoying Joycean punctuation.)

When does copyright run out?—or is young Joyce hitchiking on the Disney-MS infinite extension?

By John Emerson on 06/14/06 at 12:27 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Gwan, John, ya nut ya!

A couple of other notes on little Stephen....

By Ray Davis on 06/15/06 at 08:14 AM | Permanent link to this comment

So 2011 it is. Let’s hope that the boy doesn’t burn everything on New Year’s Eve.

One reason I ended up liking Joyce better than most of his Anglophone peers is his lack of snobbery, which includes his lack of anti-Semitism.

I am aware that this is an invalid reason to like or dislike a Modernist author.

By John Emerson on 06/15/06 at 08:57 AM | Permanent link to this comment

On the contrary, John E.—many post-1930s Joyceans (among them myself) became obsessed with Joyce precisely for the genuinely (being genuinely hard-won) humane warmth emanating from his work.

(Along with a genuinely human stink, of course. Which is how the prim grandson began justifying his universal feud, although he long ago reached the point of “I am not thinking of the offense to my grandfather.")

By Ray Davis on 06/15/06 at 09:32 AM | Permanent link to this comment

From The Globe and Mail, Stephen James Joyce is sued:

At war with the Joyce estate

Val Ross

Michael Groden met Stephen James Joyce only once, in 1984, on a receiving line at a conference in Frankfurt. That was before Stephen Joyce retired from being an aid official in Africa and emerged as one of the world’s most zealous defenders of the copyright protections of a literary estate.

The two men just might meet again in a U.S. courtroom some time soon. A lawsuit filed on June 16, 2006, by an American Joyce scholar alleges that Stephen, grandson of the writer James Joyce, along with estate trustee Sean Sweeney, improperly withheld access to materials and attempted to intimidate academics, among them the University of Western Ontario’s Groden. . . .

By Bill Benzon on 07/10/06 at 12:39 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: