Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register
Valve Links
The Front Page
Statement of Purpose
Current Authors
John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors
Past Authors
Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones
Most recent articles
The Valve - Closed For Renovation
Happy Trails to You
What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?
Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations
Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?
Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them
Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models
Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe
Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind
Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom
The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology
Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum
On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)
Symposium on Graeber’s Debt
The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation
Most recent comments
Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class
Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?
Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation
Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations
Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations
Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?
john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?
William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing
Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing
William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing
JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing
Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt
Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse
JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse
JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt
Archives
Syndication
Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom
Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom
Validation
XHTML | CSS
Credits
Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons License.
Blogroll
2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders
<< They'll Be Watching You | Front Page | Locus Winners >>
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Neurocinematics
Posted by Bill Benzon on 06/25/08 at 09:24 AM
Some folks at NYU have been doing some interesting work on how the brain responds to movies. They use a technique called inter-subject correlation analysis (ISC) in which regional responses were correlated across different subjects. Take some brain region, call it zleg. Monitor activity in the zleg of a half dozen different people as they watch, say, “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly” and compare the time course of that activity across subjects. What you are interested in is how the level of zleg changes over time. Did Francine’s zleg go high (or low, or stay the same) at the same time as Fredo’s? as Molly’s? and Jason’s? and so on. The answer depends on what they are watching. In the case of GB&U, more or less yes. But if they’re watching a single 10-minute shot looking at New York City’s Washington Square Park, then the answer is no. The critical difference, of course, is that GB&U isn’t a single continuous shot; it’s a bunch of shots skillfully edited together to keep the viewer viewing.
There’s much more the the study than just that - or one thing, the didn’t monitor just zleg, but also yipyip, xaneb, whap, all the way through to corgon, binkets, and astrup. But that much will get you started. Here’s NYU’s press release, which is useful. Here’s a link straight to a PDF of the study (543 KB). Here’s a link to the web page of NYU’s Computational Neuroimaging Laboratory. I’ve put the full abstract below the fold.
I may make a more detailed post on this once I’ve had a chance to study and digest the work.
Hasson U, Landesman O, Knappmeyer B, Vallines I, Rubin N, Heeger DJ. Neurocinematics: The neuroscience of films. Projections: The Journal for Movies and Mind, 2:1-26, 2008.
Abstract: While the recognition that films can impose a tight grip on viewers’ minds dates back to the early days of cinema, until recently there was no way to record the mental states of viewers while watching a film. In this paper, we describe a new method for assessing the effect of a given film on viewers’ brain activity. Brain activity was measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during free viewing of films, and inter-subject correlation analysis (ISC, Figure 1) was used to assess similarities in the spatiotemporal responses across viewers’ brains during movie watching. Our results demonstrate that some films can exert considerable control over brain activity (Figure 2) and eye movements (Figure 3). However, this was not the case for all types of motion picture sequences (Figure 4), and the level of control over viewers’ brain activity differed as a function of movie content (Figure 5), editing (Figure 6), anddirecting style (Figure 7). We propose that ISC may be useful to film studies by providing a quantitative neuroscientific assessment (Figures 8 and 9) of the impact of different styles of filmmaking upon viewers’ brains, and a valuable method for the film industry to better assess its products. Finally, we suggest that this method brings together two separate, largely unrelated disciplines, cognitive neuroscience and film studies, and may open the way for a new interdisciplinary field of “neurocinematic” studies.
Add a comment: