Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Friday, November 02, 2007

Joel Turnipseed Interviews Douglas Wolk

Posted by John Holbo on 11/02/07 at 11:39 PM

I haven’t found the time to say it in too many words, the way I’d like. But to say it in just enough words: Douglas Wolk’s Reading Comics [amazon] is the best damn book of literary criticism I’ve read in many a moon. It’s just fantastic. Really. (I made a bit of fun of the learned gentleman, with this post. But I subsequently struck up an acquaintance, which has been even better fun.) I do mean to get around to writing that post about comics and canonicity. But not today.

Joel Turnipseed, author of Baghdad Express, did an interview with Wolk, at kottke. Joel opens with a passage from a Robert Warshow essay, which just goes to show - as I have hinted before - how awesome is Warshow:

On the underside of our society, there are those who have no real stake at all in respectable culture. These are the open enemies of culture.... these are the readers of pulp magazines and comic books, potential book-burners, unhappy patrons of astrologers and communicants of lunatic sects, the hopelessly alienated and outclassed.... But their distance from the center gives them in the mass a degree of independence that the rest of us can achieve only individually and by discipline… when this lumpen culture displays itself in mass art forms, it can occasionally take on a purity and freshness that would almost surely be smothered higher up on the cultural scale.

The great thing about Warshow is that his echter-than-thou anti-comicbook screeds, so often conjoined with admissions that comics can be pretty good, are so far out of the mainstream, so alienated from the rise of pop culture, that their distance from the center gives them a kind of authentic independence that can hardly be matched by any of these feeble ‘comics are awesome’ posts the rest of us offer up. A book of his essays, The Immediate Experience [amazon], recently came back in print, with an introduction by Lionel Trilling, an epilogue by Stanley Cavell. The Amazon page contains excerpts from various favorable reviews - including one from Midge Decter (!). It’s very interesting, peculiar stuff.

image

Joel, by the by, usually blogs at Hotel Zero. Just a couple weeks ago he was peddling some mighty peculiar cultural criticism, courtesy of Karl Kraus:

image


Comments

That Krausian cultural criticism is indeed mighty peculiar.  I was wondering what your take on it is.

By Dave Maier on 11/03/07 at 08:11 PM | Permanent link to this comment

John,

Thanks for noting the Wolk interview. I agree that Reading Comics is fantastic--and also that Warshow is something to behold (what was it Cavell said in the afterward? “a paradoxical expression of the feelings (of gratitude one finds on discovering him) is that one wishes at once to make a present of the book to friends and to strangers, and at the same time to keep it private, as if playing for time to work out one’s own relation to it").

I loved Douglas’s response to Warshow, especially in the context of this summer’s “bloggers v. critics” wars (shame on me, too, since I’m an NBCC member).

W/r/t Kraus… was I peddling Kraus? Or just pointing out that his was my favorite--and possibly the most insane--"literary equation” of all time? For what it’s worth (and I should post this as an update), the joke is apparently that the whole equation works out to -1, when the value of x=1 and y=1. Ha ha… but you know, those Austrian geniuses had some pretty weird ideas about women, all-around.

By Joel Turnipseed on 11/04/07 at 02:02 AM | Permanent link to this comment

What weirds me out most is that he didn’t bother reducing anything (4x2 rather than 8, for instance).

I suspect it’s just supposed to be read “Female soul = [random WTFery]” though. Which is straightforward enough.

By Daniel on 11/04/07 at 02:05 AM | Permanent link to this comment

That Warshow quote is fantastic, John. Explains why I find graff so compelling. The people who started it didn’t know anything about museum & gallery art and so weren’t playing to that audience. & while graff has now made it into the museums and galleries, it’s not yet been co-opted.

By Bill Benzon on 11/04/07 at 03:18 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I stand corrected, btw: I finally looked at that equation carefully (prompted by a remark at my site), and of course: it always works out to zero (the algebra above is just an expansion of algebra below & the arithmetic works itself out).

As my mathematically-inclined commenter pointed out, “Further comment seems superfluous.”

By Joel Turnipseed on 11/04/07 at 11:20 AM | Permanent link to this comment

the joke is apparently that the whole equation works out to -1, when the value of x=1 and y=1

Except it doesn’t.  Assuming that that radical sign represents a square root, you’ve got 8*sqrt(2) sitting there, and the whole thing works out to ...

$-1+\frac{8\sqrt{2}-4}{-26}$

Which may also be funny, but the humor doesn’t jump out at one.  (You can get an integer—2—if the radical represents a seventh root, but you still don’t end up with -1, and there doesn’t seem to be much reason for interpreting the radical that way.)

By ben wolfson on 11/04/07 at 02:18 PM | Permanent link to this comment

No, it reduces to zero.  The fraction reduces to (x + y) squared minus 4 over (x + y) squared minus 4; that equals 1; the whole thing is 1 – 1 = 0.  (Under the sqrt sign we have 31.4 – 20 + 4.6 = 16, sqrt 16 = 4; 4 – 8 = -4.)

So instead of Female Soul = WTF, we have FS = something that looks like WTF but is actually zero.  In particular, maybe we have FS = something that some people (guys?) will recognize as zero (the first thing I did upon seeing that beast was to reduce it as much as possible), but others (women themselves?) will not.  Hmmmm – sounds misogynistic however you slice it.

By Dave Maier on 11/04/07 at 05:35 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Hey Joel, sorry about ‘peddling’. The equation was obviously so nutty and unserious that it didn’t cross my mind that anyone would think you actually promoted it/approved it. But maybe, conjoined with the news that you opened an interview with Warshovian grumbling, folks might have inferred you were some unfrozen cave-Austrian from the turn of the century or something. No, you are nothing of the sort.

By John Holbo on 11/04/07 at 08:54 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Under the sqrt sign we have 31.4 – 20 + 4.6 = 16, sqrt 16 = 4; 4 – 8 = -4.

Ohhhh.. I took those for multiplication signs, not decimal signs.

By ben wolfson on 11/04/07 at 09:35 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Now I feel silly. I should’ve noticed he seemed to be using both ‘x’ and ‘dot’ for multiplication. Oops. No wonder I wasn’t making any sense of the thing.

I somehow find “female soul=0” more puzzling than “female soul = [I don’t know what this says]”.

By Daniel on 11/05/07 at 04:25 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: