Welcome to The Valve

Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom


Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



About Last Night
Academic Splat
Amardeep Singh
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogging the Renaissance
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Ferule & Fescue
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Planned Obsolescence
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
Say Something Wonderful
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
What Now?
William Gibson

Thursday, April 01, 2010

Interview with Frank Donoghue

Posted by Rohan Maitzen on 04/01/10 at 08:38 PM

Puttering about the internet on this eve of a long weekend--freed, more to the point, from the usual Thursday night labor of making sure my Friday class prep is all in order--I happened across a very interesting interview with Frank Donoghue, author of The Last Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities. Here’s the part that really made me sit up straight and pay attention:

I’m not otherwise familiar with Harlot, self-described as “a digital meeting place for everyone interested in playful yet serious conversations about rhetoric in everyday life.” Looks interesting, though.


I hadn’t heard such a drastic “non-citation” statistic before so I’ve been trying to track down the source. In the Rhode book he refers to, the note after the “98% goes uncited” comment is to a piece by Lynne Cheney in the Chronicle of Higher Ed, which doesn’t seem solid enough (scholarly enough!) to lean on very hard. Still, the general point that we don’t even read each other has been made by others (including Stephen Greenblatt in that MLA address cited we’ve all alluded to before). Also of interest, to me at least, is the more general idea that we are caught in a perverse system that assumes and requires and rewards only certain forms (as he says, citing, I think, John Guillory, “scholarship expressed as publication"--and only of certain very fixed kinds).

By Rohan Maitzen on 04/01/10 at 10:02 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I’ve got a vague sense of having heard some such statistic years ago, though it wasn’t humanities specific. The general idea was that most articles, across disciplines, don’t get “read” (which is not citation) at all, or are read only a very few times. So the 98% non-citation number seems credible to me, but it should not be taken to mean that the articles aren’t read or even used (e.g. in teaching prep).

I also remember, from way back, an article about the publication habits of MLA members. At that time only 20% of the membership had published 5 or more articles. I’d suspect that’s more less still the case, and it’s probably also the case that only, say, 1% has published 30 or more articles and one or more scholarly books. So, it’s a relatively small part of the profession that does the citing.

Do the non-publishers read the literature at all? Primary journals? Monographs? Casebooks? What are sales figures for casebooks?

And . . . judging from conferences I’ve been to, an audience of 20 or 30 is pretty good.

By Bill Benzon on 04/02/10 at 07:52 AM | Permanent link to this comment

The “non-citation” thing is definitely true in the sciences.

In an analysis of ~32,000,000 scientific articles published between 1945 and 1988 (hard to believe there are that many), 18,000,000 were cited 1 or fewer times and 25,000,000 were cited 4 or fewer times.

(Figure 18 here: http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/eval_of_science_CBE(Utah).html)

By on 04/02/10 at 08:49 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Bill, reading vs citing is a good question, though my guess is that most of us rather obsessively cite everything we read/consult while working up a piece of our own.

20-30 at a conference panel seems wildly optimistic to me, though that may be because the conferences I’ve been to most recently have had very broad mandates and ridiculously crowded programs. I sweated bullets both times over papers that I ended up presenting to audiences of around 8-10 people, in one case including the other presenters. So I’m not on the conference bandwagon--also, conferences are expensive and not very ‘green.’ I’ve been wondering when we will stop touting conferences and look to other ways of networking and communicating--I dunno, say, blogging?--as new norms for exchanging ideas.

By Rohan Maitzen on 04/02/10 at 11:00 AM | Permanent link to this comment

I’m with you on conferences. When it’s good, face-to-face is THE BEST. But conferences, certainly the humongous ones, aren’t very good for that. Now, video-conferencing might be nice, but that requires more bandwidth than is common in tech-laggard nations like the USA (I don’t know about Canada).

As for reading, to those who don’t publish nonetheless read the literature for course prep? I’d think books more likely than journals, but I don’t know.

By Bill Benzon on 04/02/10 at 11:18 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:



Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: