Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Amanda Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

Sister Carrie and Television

A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Bad Books

Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

The Valley of Elah as our Heart of Darkness

“what-have-you intriguing subject”

Louis Menand, The Marketplace of Ideas

Time’s Arrow in Literary Space

Martin Amis’s Pregnant Widow

Baddest of the Bad

The “Crisis” in Literary Studies, by Mimi & Eunice

The Hurt Locker’s Addiction to Detachment, and Ours

Academic Publishing Again (or, Still)

Learning to Remember

Interesting Talk

Luther Blissett on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Tony Christini on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

Bill Benzon on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

StevenAugustine on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Athena Andreadis on Bad Books

Rohan Amanda Maitzen on "what-have-you intriguing subject"

Tony Christini on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

Bill Benzon on "what-have-you intriguing subject"

Rohan Amanda Maitzen on "what-have-you intriguing subject"

Ray Davis on Graphs, Maps, Trees and Breeding

Sisyphus on Sister Carrie and Television

Jonathan Goodwin on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

Jonathan Goodwin on A Defense of Literary Studies Anyone?

Ray Davis on Disciplinary Tension? Or, Holbo Meet Hillis

Timothy Perper on Time's Arrow in Literary Space

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Saturday, February 02, 2008

Hegel Hates The Stars

Posted by Adam Roberts on 02/02/08 at 08:19 AM

Sounds like a track by Air.  But it’s nothing but the bald truth:

Altogether, Hegel’s conversation was always a kind of monologue, sighed forth by fits and starts in a toneless voice. The baroqueness of his expressions often startled me, and I remember many of them. On beautiful starry-skied evening, we two stood next to each other at a window, and I, a young man of twenty-two who had eaten well and had good coffee, enthused about the stars and called them the abode of the bessed. But the master grumbled to himself: “The stars, hum! hum! the stars are only a gleaming leprosy in the sky.” [Heinrich Heine, Confessions (1854)]

I have no idea why Hegel hated the stars.  Unless it’s an oblique dig at what Kant saw above and therefore within him.  Hum! Hum! indeed.


Comments

Stars are highly inconvenient to certain cosmologies.  Remember Olbers’ Paradox?  (Pretty good description at wikipedia for those unfamiliar.) Leaving out the rather unlikely to occur to Hegel fractal explanation, the fact that we see stars, rather than have the entire sky have the luminosity and temperature of the surface of an average star, is evidence of a finite, expanding universe—although it’s possible without other evidence that we now have to think of it as evidence for only finitude or expansion.

By on 02/02/08 at 11:31 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Though my own attitude to the stars is Heine-esque to the point of bathos, I love Hegel’s rejoinder. It seems the guy had a personality, after all.

By Lawrence LaRiviere White on 02/02/08 at 01:52 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Come, now, use your reason.  Hegel was German.  Therefore he was a fascist.  Therefore he hated puppies and little girls.  Little girls love the stars, and puppies use the stars in their navigation.  All liberal fascists believe that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.  Likewise, the friend of my enemy is my enemy.  Thus, Hegel hated the stars.  QED.

By on 02/02/08 at 02:29 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Walter Benjamin in The Arcades Project:

“Scattered across the sky like luminous seeds of gold and silver, radiating out from the deep darkness of night, the stars represent [for Baudelaire] the ardor and energy of the human imagination.” Elisabeth Schinzel, Natur and Natursymbolik bei Poe, Baudelaire, und den fransösischen Symbolisten (Düren [Rhineland], 1931), p. 32. [J13,6]

Key passages on the stars in Baudelaire (ed. Le Dantec): “Night! You’d please me more without these stars / which speak a language I know all too well— / I Long for darkness, silence, nothing there . . .” (“Obsession”).—Ending of “Les Promesses, d’un visage”: the “enormous head of hair— / . . . which in darkness rivals you, O Night, / deep and spreading starless Night!”—“Yet neither sun nor moon appeared, / and no horizon paled” (“Réve parisien”).—“What if the waves and wind are black as ink” (“Le Voyage”). —Compare, however, “Les Yeux de Berthe,” the only weighty exception, and, in another perspective, the constellation of the stars and the aether, as it appears in “Delphine et Hippolyte” and in “Le Voyage. On the other hand, highly characteristic that “Le Crépuscule du soir” makes no mention of stars. [J21a,1]

A sardonic accent marks the spot where it is said of the stars: “decent planets, at a time like this, / renounce their vigilance—“ (“Sépulture”). [J21a,3]

The hidden figure that is the key to “Le Balcon”: the night which holds the lovers in its embrace as, after day’s departure, they dream of the dawn, is starless—“The night solidified into a wall.” [J21a,7]

By nnyhav on 02/02/08 at 03:27 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Since the beginning of time, liberals have yearned to destroy the sun. Hegel, Hitler, the whole shitload of them us.

By John Emerson on 02/02/08 at 03:48 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Well, this is different than the version of the story Heine told Lassalle:

According to Lassalle “One evening, Heine, as he often did, when he studied in Berlin, went to visit Hegel. Hegel was still busy with work; and he, Heine, went to the open window and looked out of it for a long time at the warm, starbright night. A romantic mood had him in its grip, as so often in his youth, and he had, at first in his head, and then unknowingly out loud begun to phantasize about the starlight, and the divine love and omnipotence that flowed forth therein. Suddenly, as he was standing there, forgetting where he was, a hand was laid on his shoulder and at the same time he heard the words: it isn’t the stars; yet what people put into them, that’s what it is. He turned around and Hegel stood there. From that moment on he knew, Hegel concluded, that in this man, whose doctrines he found impenetrable, beat the pulse of the century.”

By roger on 02/02/08 at 06:46 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Hegel was also close the Hoelderlin. Not an analytic philosopher.

By John Emerson on 02/03/08 at 09:40 AM | Permanent link to this comment

http://www.waggish.org/2007/04/15/heinrich-heine-on-hegel

“Summary: might be better to believe that there is something in the universe not within one’s authority or knowledge. Could be God, could be aliens, could be the unified theory.”

By on 02/03/08 at 03:48 PM | Permanent link to this comment

It must be tough when the weight the entire universe bears down on your shoulders like that.  No wonder he was so cranky, he had to figure out how to account for all those darned cankers into his grand systems.

By Jim H. on 02/04/08 at 03:31 PM | Permanent link to this comment

it was just temperament. Heine had the whole universe on him too, but he was completely blithe about it.

By John Emerson on 02/05/08 at 12:32 AM | Permanent link to this comment

All of which Hegel perceives, including what appear to be stars (or the light which reaches the earth after many centuries), arrives (apparently) via impressions upon his own subjective, perceptual apparatus.

Sense impressions are not the ding-an-sich, but part of a person’s brain.

Thus, if Hegel hates stars, he hates himself. 

Qed

By Phrumious on 02/06/08 at 03:36 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I want to tie this to your earlier reference to the Verve by saying that Hegel was definitely thinking of Kant when he grumped at Heine. All that night sky shit had already been covered, man. I guess what I’m saying is that Hegel was just trying to do the philosophical version of restless hip.

By Joseph Kugelmass on 02/08/08 at 07:00 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Which also gets us back to Air.

By Joseph Kugelmass on 02/08/08 at 07:01 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Air; breath; spirit; Geist.  It all connects.

By Adam Roberts on 02/09/08 at 07:11 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Hegel may hate stars; belle-lettrists however generally hate Hegel (and his more methodical bruder Kant).

By Nekropolis on 02/09/08 at 04:18 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Hegel is the Christian philosopher, therefore he does not worship the stars, unlike the pagans. The worship of stars belongs to satan, who belongs to the air.

Ephesians 2.2:

Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience.

By bjk on 02/19/08 at 10:22 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: