Welcome to The Valve

Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom


Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.



About Last Night
Academic Splat
Amardeep Singh
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogging the Renaissance
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Ferule & Fescue
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Planned Obsolescence
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
Say Something Wonderful
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
What Now?
William Gibson

Sunday, October 02, 2005

Editorial Sledging*

Posted by Laura Carroll on 10/02/05 at 06:38 AM

Reading the introduction in my edition of Gulliver’s Travels, I came upon this sentence:

“Only readers in a mood thoughtlessly to consume whatever the printed page offers can at this point avoid re-examining their assumptions about both the narrator and the book as a whole."


Very possibly I’m just feeling a bit fragile this weekend, but is not this an unusually pointed, detailed, and insulting swipe at the poor stupid old thoughtlessly consuming reader?

More and scarier instances of unprovoked editorial attacks on the reader’s self-esteem are sought.

(* Is the term “sledging” known outside the cricket-playing nations?  It should be.)


See Walter Kaufmann’s editorial notes to his Nietzsche translations, passim.

By Adam Kotsko on 10/02/05 at 10:20 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Laura, Ben Marcus’ article in this month’s Harper’s, alluded to by myself last night and ready to be fully worked up (by me) sometime this afternoon addresses this exact distinction (disdain for the “common” reader vs. the joys of the “textualist” or what-not).  Anyhow, I can’t link to it (not online), but I’ll sum up its arguments and such for you a little later.

By Scott Eric Kaufman on 10/02/05 at 12:22 PM | Permanent link to this comment

It should be available through EBSCO and perhaps findarticles.com.com

By Jonathan on 10/02/05 at 02:28 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Not yet, I don’t think.  Most print magazines strike deals with electronic archivers to withhold entry until at least two weeks after the magazines hit the shelves.  (At least, so said The New Yorker editor David Remnick when he lectured here last year.  He may have been talking about his magazine alone, but I didn’t get that impression.)

By Scott Eric Kaufman on 10/02/05 at 02:35 PM | Permanent link to this comment

What an odd potshot at common readers, who are, one assumes, the main audience for the book.
Did Penguin really think that this condescension toward common readers would help with sales?

By on 10/03/05 at 12:36 PM | Permanent link to this comment

That editorial comment offends me more than the direct insults of such favorite hostile writers as Baudelaire, Riding, and Bangs. Maybe it’s just the difference between stupid and smart offensiveness? The editor insults us without realizing it; he’s become so captivated by the charms of his own brilliance that he’s forgotten we’re in the room. The curse of the lecturer, I suppose. I prefer my malice deliberate and focused, thank you.

By Ray Davis on 10/03/05 at 12:37 PM | Permanent link to this comment

What a nasty touch!  It’s not exactly sledging though, is it; because that suggests a game, a tension between balanced forces, and a modicum of wit.  It’s just plain snobbery, or indeed bullying: ‘I’m a clever professor, I chose to use my platform to piss upon you proles’.  Alas it seems to me to be mroe and more a feature of academia—I mean, on my (staff) side of the fence, here in the UK, there’s an increasingly ubiquitous assumption that all students are disinclined to read, dumbed-down intellectually, sheep-like, prone to plagiary etc.  In part this is because of our govt’s on-going policy to bump up undergraduate numbers so that a notional 50% of the population are going to or have gone to university—this has diluted the quality of critical work by students a little.  But it’s more just a very ungracious dismissal of younger generations.  It’s not good.

Thsi is also a nonsensical charge to lay.  One cannot thoughtlessly read; reading requires thought.  He means ‘those who read with a less sophisticated and wide-ranging level of thought than I’, which is self-regarding as well as egotistical.

By Adam Roberts on 10/03/05 at 03:33 PM | Permanent link to this comment

And the students themselves internalize these sorts of attitudes: they characterize the reading they do for pleasure as unimportant, not “real” reading, “escapism,” etc. etc. So they believe that they can either enjoy, or think about, a book, but not both.

By Miriam Jones on 10/03/05 at 08:35 PM | Permanent link to this comment

It’s all the more unaccountable a thing to say in an intro to Gulliver’s Travels, that’s a book which obviously needs a nonthreatening explicatory apparatus.

By on 10/04/05 at 11:58 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I show my students the Ted Danson version. I have the impression that they figure if Sam Malone can understand it, they can.

By Miriam Jones on 10/05/05 at 06:31 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:



Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: