<< What is it about | Front Page | The King’s Penis: Gold or Lead? >>
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Academic Blogging
Natalia Cecire has a good post on academic blogging over at Arcade. Tne ensuing discussion is excellent.
Here’s what I posted to the discussion:
Excellent post, Natalia, and excellent discussion all.
I come at this subject from a different angle. I was trained as an academic, held an academic post, then failed to get tenure. Since then I’ve done this and that, while maintaining an active intellectual life. The advent of the web was a godsend to me, for it opened up new lines communication. Now I could easily find out about things and stuff and contact any scholar with an email address. I was once again in the mix, though a somewhat different mix, to be sure.
It’s within that context that I see my blogging. I do most of my blogging at my own blog, New Savanna, which is a mixture of various things. I could easily break it into 3 or 4 more tightly focused blogs, but why do that? (Perhaps readers would be less confused.) I post photos, personal essays (not so many of those), and material on a wide variety of topics at varying levels of sophistication and intellectual development.
I’m particularly fond of the work I’ve been doing on cartoons, most of which is analytic and descriptive. I regard that as being as important as anything I’m doing, but I don’t see how I could do that work in a formal academic venue. As far as I know, there’s no place to publish largely analytic descriptive work on cartoons. So I blog it. Most recently, a series of four posts on Porky in Wackland and eight on The Greatest Man in Siam. While some of those posts get just a tad heavy here and there, for the most part they’re pretty straightforward and accessible. Anyone who’s interested in that material can read those posts. And there’s a substantial community of folks interested in animation that isn’t being served by academia.
So, I’m a public intellectual without the reputation that seems to be part of the implicit understanding of the term.
And then there’s my work on cultural evolution. Sometime in the Fall of 2009 the National Humanities Center invited me to post to their blog. My post was scheduled to appear on July 5, 2010, and it did, a long and fairly formal post, “Cultural Evolution: A Vehicle for Cooperative Interaction Between the Sciences and the Humanities.“ Prior to that, however, I laid some groundwork at New Savanna. I wrote a series of posts on aspects of cultural evolution that I wanted to have available, but could go into in any detail in my main post. I then referred to them in that main post.
Further, I collected all those background posts into a single document and uploaded that as a PDF to my page at the Social Science Research Network where people can download them. I did the same with my main post, to which I appended the comment I wrote to close the discussion there. None of that was formal academic work, but it came close to it. And the discussion of my post, while not as extensive as I would have liked, was certainly valuable, and visible, and more or less permanently visible, unlike most academic discussions. Taken all together, I’ve roughed out a book on cultural evolution, and done so in public, more or less. Whether or not I ever actually write that book, that depends on this and that, whether and when I have the time, and whether or not there’s any interest in such a book. But the core ideas are out there, and they’re accessible, not only to academics, but to anyone.
Comments
Bill B., why is this here?
To point the way to the discussion at Arcade.
As the university developed over the last half of the 20th century it became less and less of a privileged old boys club. In many ways that was good. But as the university became larger, more diverse, and more rationalized, it became less social as well, less , well, clubby, if you will. And the casual exchange of ideas has suffered:
Strategically, young scholars and scientists saw that it was in there best interest to look outside of universities to likeminded partners who could carry on the business of collaboration (which was often intellectually fulfilling even as it was productive in research, grant success and citation). In other words, further social pressures pushed colleagues apart. It became harder and harder to ask colleagues: “will you read this article” or “do you have time for lunch to discuss ideas.” Not that the answer was invariably no – it wasn’t. But because it had become evident that what most academics required was a ‘college of one’s own’ – yet the pressures of teaching, engagement and productivity within the university were headwinds against the formation of such a culture.
And so:
The amazing thing about blogging is that an author can capture all of those feelings that sustain scholarship – that make a college of one’s own. With a blog an author can publish small pieces of information that are necessary for the development of his or her writing but are not essential features ... and will never see the light of day otherwise. Such pieces of information can sometimes form the backbone of a steady blog readership. Moreover such information can help communicate empirically to a potential press the size and variety of audiences, and, in turn, publishers can use the existence of the blog as a means for promoting new volumes. “Mind Hacks”, for instance, has done this very well.
H/t Rohan Maitzen.
And a follow-up post at Arcade:
http://arcade.stanford.edu/translation-and-general-reader