Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence La Riviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

Public Enemies

Reminder: Villette Reading Starts Next Week

The Figure of Writing and the Future of English Studies

Infinite Summer: Morbid? Culturally Imperial? Morbidly Culturally Imperial?

Strunk and White, Yuk!

Shameless Literary Tourism II

Muldoonery

Ev Psych on the Ropes?

O Zinga! Klapwrath! Psein!

Sita Sings the Freakin’ Gorgeous Blues

Filching and Owning Culture

The Sort of Book You Actually Want to Write: “Big Sid’s Vincati”

Jump Cut 51

Anxieties of Affiliation: The Creative Writing Program and Transnationalism

Shameless Literary Tourism in Dublin: Bloomsday 2009

Jake on Public Enemies

Mark on Strunk and White, Yuk!

Vicky Greenaway on Public Enemies

Luther Blissett on Infinite Summer: Morbid? Culturally Imperial? Morbidly Culturally Imperial?

Adam Roberts on Public Enemies

Alex Gildzen on Public Enemies

Pat.R on On the Future of Academic Publishing, Peer Review, and Tenure Requirements

Jonathan Mayhew on Strunk and White, Yuk!

Matt Thomas on Strunk and White, Yuk!

tomemos on Strunk and White, Yuk!

Bill Benzon on Hobbit-holey-space

Jim on Strunk and White, Yuk!

Andrew Seal on Infinite Summer: Morbid? Culturally Imperial? Morbidly Culturally Imperial?

Scott Eric Kaufman on Infinite Summer: Morbid? Culturally Imperial? Morbidly Culturally Imperial?

Wrongshore on Infinite Summer: Morbid? Culturally Imperial? Morbidly Culturally Imperial?

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

A David Foster Wallace Syllabus

Posted by Scott Eric Kaufman on 09/23/08 at 08:09 PM

(via UD.)

One of David Foster Wallace’s students posted the syllabus to his “Literary Interpretation” course.  Before anyone accuses me of taking a morbid interest in the recently deceased, let me say this: people who write syllabi appreciate a fine syllabi, and this is a fine syllabi.  Here’s the “BASIC COURSE SPIEL”:

The goals of this section of E67 are to survey certain important forms of modern literature—short stories, novels, poems—and to introduce you to some techniques for achieving a critical appreciation of literary art.  “Critical appreciation” means having smart, sophisticated reasons for liking whatever literature you like, and being able to articulate those reasons to other people, especially in writing.  Vital for critical appreciation is the ability to “interpret” a piece of literature, which basically means coming up with a cogent, interesting account of what a piece of lit means, what it’s trying to do to/for the reader, what technical choices the author’s made in order to achieve the effects she wants, and so on.  As you can probably anticipate, the whole thing gets very complicated and abstract and hard, which is one reason why entire college departments are devoted to studying and interpreting literature.

From the “Caveat Emptor Page”:

(2) Your instructor has taught intro lit courses before, but not for several years, and never before at a college this selective. The upshot is that there may be a certain pedagogical clunkiness about this section of English 67. You will, in effect, be helping me learn how to teach this class. The level of our discussions may have to be adjusted up, or down, depending on how well-prepared you guys are and how quickly you catch on to the concepts and techniques of “close reading.” Certain approaches might turn out to be a waste of time. There may be abrupt changes in the syllabus. Extra work may be added. Let me say that again: Extra work may be added.

(4) Your instructor has high standards for the written work you turn in. Take another close look at Course Rules & Procedures Items 4 and 7 on page 3 of the syllabus. I know that many professors say this kind of hard-ass stuff at the beginning of the term but don’t actually mean it or enforce it as the course wears on. I, however, do mean it, and I will enforce it—feel free to verify this with students who’ve taken other classes with me. If you want to improve your academic writing and are willing to put extra time and effort into it, I am a good teacher to have. But if you’re used to whipping off papers the night before they’re due, running them quickly through the computer’s Spellchecker, handing them in full of high-school errors and sentences that make no sense, and having the professor accept them “because the ideas are good” or something, please be informed that I draw no distinction between the quality of one’s ideas and the quality of those ideas’ verbal expression, and that I will not accept sloppy, rough-draftish, or semiliterate college writing. Again, I am absolutely not kidding.


Comments

I wish I had the stones (and professorial support, not that I should be taken to mean that I don’t have that, because I’ve always lacked the stones) to enforce a policy like that in (4).

By ben wolfson on 09/24/08 at 01:11 PM | Permanent link to this comment

The condensed read: “I’ll teach you how to write, provided you already know how to write.”

I love how many professors—and Wallace’s tough-cop drag just highlights what was common practice at the two universities I’ve attended—pass the buck on teaching writing at the same time that they claim to be teaching writing: “Your high school teacher should have taught you all that stuff about sentences and grammar and organization and such.”

(Of course, it depends on what level this course is.  It sounds like an introduction for majors, so I’m assuming it’s, like, second semester freshmen taking it.)

By on 09/24/08 at 09:12 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I take it you do mostly TAing, ben?  Because it’s not that difficult to insert that kind of language into a composition syllabus—it’s just difficult to do it so well.

LB, you need to look at the syllabus itself.  He’s basically offered his whole self up, and is saying if you don’t take him up on it and turn in subpar work, you’re in for a post-HS shock.

By Scott Eric Kaufman on 09/24/08 at 09:31 PM | Permanent link to this comment

The language is the point of interest for me (and yes, TAing). I mean the policy.

By ben wolfson on 09/24/08 at 10:56 PM | Permanent link to this comment

ben, sorry if I sounded haughty there.  I didn’t mean “TAing” in a diminutive sense, just wanted to make sure I caught the vibe of “I can’t set the policy in a large philosophy lecture, because I’m the TA, not the teacher of record” correctly.  Composition classes are odd beasts in this respect, inasmuch as people who have no experience teaching are allowed to write syllabi full of whatever expectations they so desire.  Good course directors curtail excesses, but that doesn’t change the fact that an undergraduate’s first one-on-one experience with a professorial type is often with one of my ilk with little pedagogical experience.

By Scott Eric Kaufman on 09/24/08 at 11:03 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Wait, I meant “the language isn’t the point of interest”.

By ben wolfson on 09/24/08 at 11:07 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I took the Literary Interpretation course at Pomona back in 1964. I don’t even remember the name of the prof, but his attitude towards the course was almost exactly the same as Wallace’s. The syllabus may reflect an institutional tradition, though Wallace’s voice is unmistakably his own.

By Jim Harrison on 09/25/08 at 01:22 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: