Welcome to The Valve
Login
Register


Valve Links

The Front Page
Statement of Purpose

John Holbo - Editor
Scott Eric Kaufman - Editor
Aaron Bady
Adam Roberts
Amardeep Singh
Andrew Seal
Bill Benzon
Daniel Green
Jonathan Goodwin
Joseph Kugelmass
Lawrence LaRiviere White
Marc Bousquet
Matt Greenfield
Miriam Burstein
Ray Davis
Rohan Maitzen
Sean McCann
Guest Authors

Laura Carroll
Mark Bauerlein
Miriam Jones

Past Valve Book Events

cover of the book Theory's Empire

Event Archive

cover of the book The Literary Wittgenstein

Event Archive

cover of the book Graphs, Maps, Trees

Event Archive

cover of the book How Novels Think

Event Archive

cover of the book The Trouble With Diversity

Event Archive

cover of the book What's Liberal About the Liberal Arts?

Event Archive

cover of the book The Novel of Purpose

Event Archive

The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Happy Trails to You

What’s an Encyclopedia These Days?

Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Intimate Enemies: What’s Opera, Doc?

Alphonso Lingis talks of various things, cameras and photos among them

Feynmann, John von Neumann, and Mental Models

Support Michael Sporn’s Film about Edgar Allen Poe

Philosophy, Ontics or Toothpaste for the Mind

Nazi Rules for Regulating Funk ‘n Freedom

The Early History of Modern Computing: A Brief Chronology

Computing Encounters Being, an Addendum

On the Origin of Objects (towards a philosophy of computation)

Symposium on Graeber’s Debt

The Nightmare of Digital Film Preservation

Richard Petti on Occupy Wall Street: America HAS a Ruling Class

Bill Benzon on Whatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhatwhat?

Nick J. on The Valve - Closed For Renovation

Bill Benzon on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Norma on Encyclopedia Britannica to Shut Down Print Operations

Bill Benzon on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

john balwit on What’s an Object, Metaphysically Speaking?

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on That Shakespeare Thing

William Ray on That Shakespeare Thing

JoseAngel on That Shakespeare Thing

Bill Benzon on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Bill Benzon on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on A Dirty Dozen Sneaking up on the Apocalypse

JoseAngel on Objects and Graeber's Debt

Advanced Search

Articles
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

Comments
RSS 1.0 | RSS 2.0 | Atom

XHTML | CSS

Powered by Expression Engine
Logo by John Holbo

Creative Commons Licence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

 


Blogroll

2blowhards
About Last Night
Academic Splat
Acephalous
Amardeep Singh
Beatrice
Bemsha Swing
Bitch. Ph.D.
Blogenspiel
Blogging the Renaissance
Bookslut
Booksquare
Butterflies & Wheels
Cahiers de Corey
Category D
Charlotte Street
Cheeky Prof
Chekhov’s Mistress
Chrononautic Log
Cliopatria
Cogito, ergo Zoom
Collected Miscellany
Completely Futile
Confessions of an Idiosyncratic Mind
Conversational Reading
Critical Mass
Crooked Timber
Culture Cat
Culture Industry
CultureSpace
Early Modern Notes
Easily Distracted
fait accompi
Fernham
Ferule & Fescue
Ftrain
GalleyCat
Ghost in the Wire
Giornale Nuovo
God of the Machine
Golden Rule Jones
Grumpy Old Bookman
Ideas of Imperfection
Idiocentrism
Idiotprogrammer
if:book
In Favor of Thinking
In Medias Res
Inside Higher Ed
jane dark’s sugarhigh!
John & Belle Have A Blog
John Crowley
Jonathan Goodwin
Kathryn Cramer
Kitabkhana
Languagehat
Languor Management
Light Reading
Like Anna Karina’s Sweater
Lime Tree
Limited Inc.
Long Pauses
Long Story, Short Pier
Long Sunday
MadInkBeard
Making Light
Maud Newton
Michael Berube
Moo2
MoorishGirl
Motime Like the Present
Narrow Shore
Neil Gaiman
Old Hag
Open University
Pas au-delà
Philobiblion
Planned Obsolescence
Printculture
Pseudopodium
Quick Study
Rake’s Progress
Reader of depressing books
Reading Room
ReadySteadyBlog
Reassigned Time
Reeling and Writhing
Return of the Reluctant
S1ngularity::criticism
Say Something Wonderful
Scribblingwoman
Seventypes
Shaken & Stirred
Silliman’s Blog
Slaves of Academe
Sorrow at Sills Bend
Sounds & Fury
Splinters
Spurious
Stochastic Bookmark
Tenured Radical
the Diaries of Franz Kafka
The Elegant Variation
The Home and the World
The Intersection
The Litblog Co-Op
The Literary Saloon
The Literary Thug
The Little Professor
The Midnight Bell
The Mumpsimus
The Pinocchio Theory
The Reading Experience
The Salt-Box
The Weblog
This Public Address
This Space: The Fire’s Blog
Thoughts, Arguments & Rants
Tingle Alley
Uncomplicatedly
Unfogged
University Diaries
Unqualified Offerings
Waggish
What Now?
William Gibson
Wordherders

Friday, February 12, 2010

2666 Part 2: Amalfitano

Posted by Adam Roberts on 02/12/10 at 04:59 AM

[Part 1 here] ‘The Part About Amalfitano’ is a little over a third the length of ‘The Part About the Critics’, and it picks up one of the characters from the first section: the academic philosopher at the Mexican University of Santa Teresa, Amalfitano.  It is one undivided piece of prose, although it falls in the telling into two roughly equal parts.  In the first we learn that Amalfitano, whom the critics were sure was gay, ‘had a daughter who always lived with him. Hard to believe but true’ [163]; we learn all about the mother of this child, a crazy Spanish girl called Lola, in Barcelona.  Amalfitano’s passive, suffering love for Lola is only a small part of this; much more space is given to the story of Lola’s passion for an insane poet, whom (she claims) had sex with her once at a party in Barcelona.  The poet is now confined to an asylum in Mondragón, near San Sebastián (in Spain), and Lola abandons Amalfitano and their small daughter to hitch-hike there.  She hangs around for a while, eventually meets the poet, sleeps in a cemetery, has sex with pretty much any man who approaches her, makes her way up to France, occasionally sending Amalfitano letters detailing her adventures.  In Paris she gets work as an office cleaner, and has another child, a son this time.  When she returns to Barcelona she has AIDS.  She sees her husband and daughter, and then hitch-hikes away again.

This vision of Lola lingered in his mind for many years, like a memory rising from glacial seas, although in fact he hadn’t seen anything, which meant there was nothing to remember, only the shadow of his ex-wife projected on the neighbouring buildings in the beam of the streetlights, and then the dream of Lola walking off down one of the highways out of Sant Cugat, walking along the side of the road, an almost deserted road since most cars took the new toll highway to save time, a woman bowed by the weight of her suitcase, fearless, walking fearlessly along the side of the road. [185]

Then the action shifts to Mexico, where Amalfitano has taken a university position. He lives in a house with Rosa, his (now) grown-up daughter.  His life seems settled enough externally, but actually Amalfitano is a mass of anxieties. Some of these are more-or-less rational—a serial killer is murdering Santa Teresa’s young women by the hundreds, and he (and we, the readers) are concerned about the safety of his daughter.  But some are harder to understand. When the critics visited Amalfitano’s house in Part 1 they noticed a weatherworn book hanging pegged to a line in the back garden, about which Amalfitano behaved strangely.  In this part we discover this reason it is there—a geometry textbook hung, originally, in imitation of a Duchamp readymade, but which assumes enormous though inchoate symbolic significance for Amalfitano.

The theme of this part, if I might venture a reductive reading, is madness.  Amalfitano’s ex-wife Lola is ‘mad’ in a certain way: stalking her poet according to an obsessive personal narrative that is disconnected from reality (that she and the poet are destined to be lovers forever), she is also unhinged from conventional responsibilities (for instance: the duties towards her daughter) and rather more sexually disinhibited than is good for her.  Amalfitano worries that ‘madness is contagious’ [177], and although he is a much more conventional fellow, behaviourally and mentally, the second half of this section details a number of psychopathological developments: his anxiety becomes all consuming and prompts compulsive ritual behaviour (for instance, about the dangling book); he has gaps in his memory and, schizophrenically, he hears and indeed has lengthy conversations with the voice of his dead father.  This haunting voice is by turns reassuring (‘I beg you to forgive me, I beg you to relax, I beg you not consider this a violation of your freedom’) and aggressively, homophobically hostile (‘Yes, queer, faggot, cocksucker … are you a queer? are you?’).  The section ends with Amalfitano becoming fascinating with a mad little book he has acquired, a privately printed treatise that seeks to prove the natives of the South American continent with super-civilized telepathic race descended from the ancient Greeks.

Madness is probably too capacious vague a word, and pejoratively loaded to boot; but the explicit focus of this second part reflects us back upon the first—for the critics too, in their way, were evidently mad: driven by an obsessive compulsion that fixated, in the first instance, upon Archimboldi, and in the second became an inwardly directly quasi-sexual obsession within the group.  It might not go too far to suggest that the novel, by presenting a glittering cloud of scattered detail and inviting us to make sense of it, to assemble it into something coherent, doesn’t in its way seek to interpellate us as mildly mad ourselves.  We are caught in a search for meaning, we consider ourselves to have a ‘special’ relationship to a writer (Bolaño), we spend our time constructing elaborate and doubtless improbable theories to explain all this welter of stuff.  There’s the sense of the book zeroing in on the serial killings, too; although whether this is, lengthily and rather obliquely, establishing valences of ‘madness’ through which to read those crimes remains to be seen.


Comments

There seems to be a certain amount of Rosa/Lola confusion in this, e.g. ‘Rosa abandons Amalfitano and their small daughter to hitch-hike there’... or is that on purpose? (I haven’t read the novel.)

By on 02/12/10 at 12:32 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Thanks, Sam; you’re quite right. Sloppy of me ... I have corrected it.

By Adam Roberts on 02/12/10 at 12:46 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Trying to figure out how reading Adam on 2666 is not going to become my chosen substitute for reading 2666. . . .

By on 02/12/10 at 01:03 PM | Permanent link to this comment

Is it fair to say that *2666* is what happens when Ballard or Stewart Home rewrites Byatt’s *Possession*?  Tell me no; I need something to convince me that fiction since 1950 isn’t a slow crawl up its own ass.

By on 02/12/10 at 10:48 PM | Permanent link to this comment

I’m in the middle of Part 4 at the moment, and it’s more like CSI: Mexico mated with LA Confidential and directed by David Lynch.

Which is to say, I wouldn’t say that fiction since 1950 has been crawling up its own ass; I’d say it’s been crawling up cinema’s ass.  To be precise, I’d say ‘arse’; but I wouldn’t want to fight over it.

By Adam Roberts on 02/13/10 at 08:54 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Ah technique!

While it may appear that the novel collapsed in the “West” of its own weight around the turn of the century, a century ago, very roughly, I think it’s more accurate to note that it collapsed, or was warped, due to sociopolitical throttling.

The novel was partially revived in the twentieth century by the international and multicultural forces of the left - from where it seems to me the most exciting and promising developments continue to appear.

Much of this history and creativity is explored in our recently released Liberation Literature anthology. Do your students a favor and get one into your respective institutional libraries:
http://liblit.org/2009/12/23/liberation-lit-anthology/

By Tony Christini on 02/13/10 at 03:49 PM | Permanent link to this comment

...if I might venture a reductive reading...

I just realized that people without formal training in literature don’t use this phrase, but if they did, they’d probably use it to refer to actual reading - i.e. being one with the book, over simultaneous storytime and lifetime. That would seem to be a heavy venture in its own ways - and the very opposite of reduction. Variegation, perhaps? Fractalization, presenting more skin about the same soul? ‘If I might venture a multiplication, friends...’

Or maybe all I mean to say is that any ‘reading’ (in the lit-crit sense) must by definition be ‘reductive,’ so I start wondering what purpose the preemptive polite formality serves, assuming it’s a darker or more fallen thing than a throat-clearing.

Maybe it’s just the flu talking. I am fucked up in the respiratory system right now. Feels like I consist today of nothing more! Well I’m enjoying these posts anyhow - though I can’t help thinking you led me astray a bit re: Brasyl...

By waxbanks on 02/15/10 at 10:48 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Wax: sorry to hear about your flu.  What did I say about Brasyl?

By Adam Roberts on 02/16/10 at 08:02 AM | Permanent link to this comment

Add a comment:

Name:
Email:
Location:
URL:

 

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Please enter the word you see in the image below: